Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Bharat Patel, Alibaba Charchor, Inc. And Mukesh Patel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that a Rule 60(b) motion filed nearly 11 months after judgment was not within a reasonable time
• finding that the filing of a Rule 60(b)(4) eleven months after the district court’s judgement did not satisfy Rule 60(c)’s reasonable time requirement.
• affirming a district court’s denial of a Rule 60(b)(4) • motion filed eleven months after judgment as untimely under an abuse-of-discretion standard
• noting that appellant \did not attempt to identify any good reason\ for the delay in filing his Rule 60(b)(4) motion and then affirming district court's denial of Rule 60(b)(4) motion when motion was filed 11 months after the judgment was entered
• denying relief from default judgment in part because the movant “[did] not attempt to identify any good reason for not filing his 60(b)(4) motion” earlier
• denying relief from default judgment, in part, because the movant “d[id] not attempt to identify any good reason for not filing his 60(b)(4) motion. . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).