Dayomic Jackie Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the transcripts were indispensable to addressing the appellant’s claim that the prosecutor repeatedly referred to facts not in evidence
• holding that this Court lacks authority to make exceptions to the filing requirements established in Rule 5A:8 (quoting Turner v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 96, 99 (1986))
• holding that “[t]his Court has no authority to make exceptions to the filing requirements” for transcripts “set out in the Rules” (quoting Turner, 2 Va. App. at 99)
• holding that “[t]his Court has no authority to make exceptions to the filing requirements” for transcripts “set out in the Rules” (quoting Turner, 2 Va. App. at 99)
• holding that “[t]his Court has no authority to make exceptions to the filing requirements” for transcripts “set out in the Rules” (quoting Turner v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 96, 99 (1986))
• holding that “[t]his Court has no authority to make exceptions to the filing requirements” for transcripts “set out in the Rules” (quoting Turner v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 96, 99 (1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).