· 9/18/2003
Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A.
Citations
- 284 F. Supp. 2d 204
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17223
- 2003 WL 22247172
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “Martinez is a persuasive argument for applying Morgan” to the exhaustion analysis
- noting that “Martinez is a persuasive argument for applying Morgan” to the exhaustion analysis.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.