Skip to main content
· 7/2/2004

Daynard v. MRRM, P.A.

Citations

  • 335 F. Supp. 2d 156
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18814
  • 2004 WL 2071503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the choice-of-law framework separately to a contract claim and a tort claim because the court recognized the same substantive state law would not necessarily apply to both

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.