Skip to main content
· 4/12/2005

Daye v. Potter

Citations

  • 380 F. Supp. 2d 718
  • 10 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1109
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14716
  • 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,937
  • 2005 WL 1501498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that “fail[ing] to show ‘excusable neglect’ or any sufficient basis for failing to timely file a Response [to defendant’s motion to dismiss] … Plaintiff will be deemed to have waived his right to respond as provided in Local Rule 7.3(k)”
  • applying the Pioneer excusable neglect factors in considering an untimely filing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beaty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.