Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
· 9/7/2000

Day v. Wall

Citations

  • 112 F. Supp. 2d 833
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13388
  • 2000 WL 1290997

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiff had no legal right to benefits erroneously distributed pursuant to a void QDRO
  • holding plaintiff had no legal right to benefits erroneously distributed pursuant to a void QDRO
  • holding plaintiff had no legal right to benefits erroneously distributed pursuant to a void QDRO

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.