Day v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing three-year period under FLSA from six-year period under NYLL and rejecting plaintiff’s request to apply the six-year period
• finding argument that six-year notice period will cause confusion is more persuasive than argument that using the longer period is more economical
• allowing notice distribution to employees who signed arbitration agreements because agreements to arbitrate are irrelevant to whether employees were “similarly situated” regarding alleged FLSA violation
• approving notice to potential plaintiffs who may have signed arbitration agreements when there existed issues of fact concerning the arbitration agreements
• “[T]he focus of the inquiry is not on whether there has been an actual violation of law but rather on whether the proposed plaintiffs are similarly situated . . . with respect to their allegations that the law has been violated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).