Day v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is a matter of surprise that 27 these sections of this act, so severe in their penalties, are so generally disregarded in our cities and towns.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McDonald v. City of Chicago
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-28· cited 2,024×
• Kachalsky v. County of Westchester
  Second Circuit· 2012-11-27· cited 204×
• State v. Christian
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-21· cited 4×
• State ex rel. Cheek v. Rollings
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1957-12-06· cited 3×