Day v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order of restitution is inappropriate for injuries the victim suffers as a result of `conduct that was not the subject of the defendant's prosecution and for which a subsequent prosecution would be necessary'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Butler v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-11-13· cited 18×
• Lamar v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-04-27· cited 11×
• Theodorou v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2010-06-30· cited 10×
• Best v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-08-27· cited 9×
• Grace v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-08-27· cited 8×
• Murphy v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-08-13· cited 6×
• B.M.J. v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-05-26· cited 5×
• Heupel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-08-24· cited 3×
• Holderfield v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2017-10-13· cited 2×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2009-12-18· cited 1×
• BMJ v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-05-26
• Lámar v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-04-27
• Dawson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2010-06-25

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strough v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-12-30· cited 31×
• Kyser v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-04-14· cited 28×
• Welcher v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-01-27· cited 11×