Skip to main content
S.D. Ohio· 11/20/1992

Day v. NLO, INC.

Citations

  • 811 F. Supp. 1271
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20671
  • 1992 WL 424058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Ohio’s exclusive remedy rule governs “mental-physical” and “physical-mental” claims
  • finding that Ohio's exclusive remedy rule governs \mental-physical\ and \physical-mental\ claims
  • “Because of ongoing court supervision, any medical monitoring awarded by this Court would constitute equitable relief.”
  • summarily noting in factual background that Ohio law applied under § 2014(hh)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spiegel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.