Skip to main content
· 7/15/1842

Day v. Lafferty

Citations

  • 4 Ark. 450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Lanham Act does not “support[ ] jurisdiction in this court”
  • Since plaintiff “failed to place a restrictive legend on the proposal he sent to the [Government]” any property interest he had in those ideas was destroyed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.