· 7/15/1842
Day v. Lafferty
Citations
- 4 Ark. 450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Lanham Act does not “support[ ] jurisdiction in this court”
- Since plaintiff “failed to place a restrictive legend on the proposal he sent to the [Government]” any property interest he had in those ideas was destroyed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dickinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.