Skip to main content
· 6/4/1906

Day v. Bailey

Citations

  • 117 La. 154
  • 41 So. 448
  • 1906 La. LEXIS 661

Syllabus

<p>Injunction — Anciulakt Injunction.</p> <p>An ancillary injunction necessarily falls with the main suit.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see vol. 27, Cent. Dig. Injunction, § 392.]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding removal unlikely and detention indefinite where the Government was 9 unable to secure necessary travel documents to effectuate removal for more than a year after 10 final order of removal was issued
  • finding removal unlikely and detention indefinite where the Government was 9 unable to secure necessary travel documents to effectuate removal for more than a year after 10 final order of removal was issued
  • removal not reasonably foreseeable where government had no specific 14 timeframe for removal and no travel document despite frequent follow-ups with the consulate
  • removal not reasonably foreseeable where government had no specific timeframe for 20 removal and no travel document despite frequent follow-ups with the consulate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Proyosty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.