Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 3/9/1983

Day v. Amax, Inc.

Citations

  • 701 F.2d 1258
  • 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the district court’s grant of a directed verdict on whether the defendant’s description of equipment and quotation of prices constituted an offer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bright, Gibson, Lay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Day v. Amax, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.