Skip to main content
· 4/18/1899

Dawson v. Waldheim

Citations

  • 80 Mo. App. 52
  • 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing appellant's appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction because a proper and timely notice of appeal was not filed
  • observing there is no right to hybrid representation under either the United States or South Carolina constitution and explaining substantive documents submitted pro se by litigants who are represented by counsel should not be accepted by the clerk of court for filing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.