Dawson v. Prager

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, in Kansas, \expert testimony is necessary to prove a deviation from the standard of care by a health care provider where normal experience and qualifications of laypersons serving as jurors would not permit them to draw proper conclusions\
• \Expert testimony is necessary to prove a deviation from the standard of care by a health care provider.\
• ordinary words are given their ordinary meaning in defining professional time devoted to actual clinical practice within 2 years preceding incident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).