Skip to main content
· 6/28/1982

Dawson v. New York

Citations

  • 458 U.S. 1112
  • 102 S. Ct. 3496
  • 73 L. Ed. 2d 1375
  • 50 U.S.L.W. 3998
  • 1982 U.S. LEXIS 2860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding substantial need for discovery of work product on theory that statements would aid in impeaching defendant, where plaintiff had several of defendant’s other statements which revealed inconsistencies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brennan, Certiorari, Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.