Skip to main content
· 7/28/1982

Dawson v. Eli Lilly and Co.

Citations

  • 543 F. Supp. 1330
  • 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying District of Columbia law, and describing similar approaches in Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Washington and West Virginia law
  • discovery rule avoids unfairness of interpreting statute of limitations to accrue when injury occurs if at time plaintiff does not have enough information upon which to bring suit
  • “We cannot decide as a matter of law that plaintiff did not exercise due diligence in discovering defendants’ alleged wrongdoing. This is a question of fact to be decided by the jury.”
  • bench ruling of Van Sciver, J.
  • applying District of Columbia law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joyce Hens Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.