District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/28/1964
Dawson v. Dawson
Citations
- 164 So. 2d 536
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- alimony unconnected with divorce not available because at time suit filed, \parties did not bear the marital relation.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sturgis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Keller v. KellerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-03· cited 22×
- Reese v. ReeseSupreme Court of Florida· 1966-11-23· cited 13×
- Gilvary v. GilvaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-11· cited 4×
- Brandt v. BrandtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-12-05· cited 2×
- Hodge v. HodgeSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 1977-12-14· cited 2×
- Mecalling v. Ralle Realty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-06-13
- Barco v. BarcoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-03-12
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Marsicano v. MarsicanoSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-03-19· cited 36×
- Prine v. PrineSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-06-15· cited 35×
- Astor v. AstorSupreme Court of Florida· 1956-09-12· cited 18×
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida· 1957-07-10· cited 11×
- Todd v. ToddSupreme Court of Florida· 1942-07-14· cited 9×
- Astor v. AstorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-12-02· cited 8×
- Astor v. AstorSupreme Court of Florida· 1960-05-03· cited 7×
- Coppersmith v. CoppersmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1961-03-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.