Daws Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Ostoyic

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claimant could pursue PTD benefits on her physical condition alone (as to which she had reached MMI), on her psychiatric condition alone (after she reached psychiatric MMI), or on both (again, after she reached psychiatric MMI)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg/City of St. Petersburg Risk Management
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-23· cited 19×
• Rivendell of Ft. Walton v. Petway
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-30· cited 12×
• Matrix Employee Leasing, Inc. v. Hadley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-29· cited 11×
• Allen v. Protel, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-21· cited 8×
• Metropolitan Title & Guar. Co. v. Muniz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-12· cited 7×
• Brevard County School Board v. Hopkins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-23

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• City of Pensacola Firefighters v. Oswald
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-15· cited 30×
• John Barley Memorial v. Gillam
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-25· cited 11×
• Copeland Steel v. Miles
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-01-06· cited 7×
• Smith v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-22· cited 5×
• McFarlane, Ferguson v. Whaley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-11· cited 4×
• Farms v. Sheets
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-01· cited 3×
• Crews v. Hussman Refrigeration
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-08· cited 2×