Dawkins v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an Indiana Board final determination is arbitrary or capricious “when it is without some basis which would lead a reasonable person to the same conclusion” (citation omitted)
• reproduction cost for assessment purposes means reproduction cost as determined by regulation, not actual reproduction cost
• BOR failed to comply with statutory procedures for assessment, but because State Board complied with the restrictions placed on its section 6-1.1-14—10 power, State Board could properly assess property sua sponte

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).