Skip to main content

Dawkins v. State

Citations

  • 412 S.E.2d 407
  • 306 S.C. 391
  • 1991 S.C. LEXIS 240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to recognize a public policy exception to the lex loci delicti rule and determining application of Georgia substantive law, which required actual bodily contact with a plaintiff as a result of the defendant’s conduct in emotional distress actions, was appropriate
  • application of Georgia’s impact rule in a South Carolina court would not violate the public policy exception to the rule of lex loci delicti
  • application of Georgia’s impact rule in a South Carolina court would not violate the public policy exception to the rule of lex loci delicti
  • it is well established in South Carolina that in tort cases law of place where injury was occasioned or inflicted, governs in respect of right of action, and law of forum in respect to matters pertaining to remedy only
  • “The ‘good morals or natural justice’ of our State are not violated when foreign law is applied to preclude a tort action for money damages...even if recovery may be had upon application of South Carolina law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler, Gregory, Harwell, Finney, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.