Dawkins, Inc. v. Huff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that policy in this state is to liberally vacate defaults so disputes can be reached on their merits
• “[A] court always has jurisdiction during the progress of a case to set aside or modify an interlocutory order before final judgment.”
• interlocutory orders are not within the restrictions provided in Rule 1.540 and such orders remain within the inherent power of the trial court to modify or set aside during the progress of the case prior to final judgment
• clerk's default not reviewable as non-final order under rule 9.130

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).