Skip to main content
· 10/1/2009

Dawe v. Corrections USA

Citations

  • 263 F.R.D. 613
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96461
  • 2009 WL 3233883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving “typical hourly rates [of] $650–950 per hour for partners, $350–600 per hour for associates, and $180 per hour for staff and paralegals.”
  • noting that “the lodestar method [was] used as a cross-check”
  • finding recovery of 22.8 percent reasonable in light of the relatively early stage of the litigation and potential hurdles lying ahead for plaintiffs
  • finding that 22.8% recovery was fair and reasonable
  • “Since the lodestar method is being used as a cross check, it is enough to note that the one third award is roughly commensurate with the work performed by class counsel.”
  • awarding a total of $97,500 to seven class representatives

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brennan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.