Davis's Admr. v. Gray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment in favor of, inter alia, defendant manufacturer following exclusion of testimony from plaintiff’s experts
• \[A]ll jurisdictions\ require expert testimony on issues \outside the realm of common knowledge and experience of a lay juror.\
• “That one's bone might break if crushed in a car crash is within the ordinary experience of a lay person.”
• “As in any products liability or personal injury action, Plaintiffs must prove causation—that the Defendants’ conduct . . . was the proximate cause of Plaintiffs’ injuries.”
• \ Mirena Perforation/SJ \, aff'd , 713 Fed. Appx. 11 (2d Cir. 2017
• \Case reports are not reliable evidence of causation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).