Davison v. People
Citations
- 90 Ill. 221
Syllabus
<p>1. Grand juror—age, as a disqualification. The fact that a grand juror is over the age of sixty years, does not disqualify him from acting; It is only a privilege for which he may claim to be excused.</p> <p>2. Same—non-residence. Alienage is not a disqualification to a juror, even in a capital case, but is only a privilege or ground of challenge. So the fact that a grand juror was a resident of another State at the time an indictment was found affords no ground of disqualification.</p> <p>3. Impeaching a verdict—of the proof required. Where the examination of a juror on his voir dire shows him to be competent, a new trial will not be granted in a criminal case on affidavits showing the expression of his opinion of the prisoner’s guilt, where the counter affidavits are such that the court is not satisfied the juror swore falsely on his examination, or was disqualified. To show that a juror has sworn falsely on his voir dire, the evidence must clearly preponderate in establishing that fact.</p> <p>4. Evidence in criminad cases—res gestae. On the trial of one for murder in shooting one who was one of the commissioners of highways, while attempting to remove the defendant’s fence, evidence that the place where the fence was situated was not a public highway, is not admissible in evidence as a part of the res gestae on the part of the defense, when the alleged vacation of the road, if there was one, was a long time prior to the killing. The fact that there was a dispute as to whether there was a road there or not at the time, would explain the motives and feelings of the accused.</p> <p>5. Same — cross-examination. A cross-examination of a witness must be kept within fair and reasonable limits, and is, to some extent, discretionary with the judge trying the case. There is no error in refusing questions respecting conversations previous to the day of a homicide, respecting the subject of the dispute out of which the difficulty grew. ' If the witness has bad feelings t
Judges: Dickey, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. WillyIllinois Supreme Court· 1921-12-22· cited 69×
- People v. StombaughIllinois Supreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 44×
- Hayner v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1904-12-22· cited 38×
- The People v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1930-12-18· cited 25×
- State v. PickettSupreme Court of Iowa· 1897-12-15· cited 24×
- Marzen v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1898-04-21· cited 23×
- Green v. KeenanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1956-05-22· cited 20×
- People v. EatmanIllinois Supreme Court· 1950-03-22· cited 19×
- The People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court· 1949-09-22· cited 16×
- People v. DillardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1972-06-02· cited 13×
- People v. MirabellaIllinois Supreme Court· 1920-06-16· cited 11×
- Hutson v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois· 1974-01-16· cited 9×
- People v. MartellaroIllinois Supreme Court· 1917-12-19· cited 8×
- People v. CapelloIllinois Supreme Court· 1918-02-20· cited 8×
- Spelina v. SporryAppellate Court of Illinois· 1935-03-29· cited 8×
- People v. RawnMichigan Supreme Court· 1892-02-19· cited 6×
- The People v. CoffmanIllinois Supreme Court· 1930-02-21· cited 4×
- Locher v. KlugaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1901-10-24· cited 3×
- Powers v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois· 1891-12-03· cited 2×
- People v. StrauchAppellate Court of Illinois· 1908-10-14· cited 2×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.