· 5/28/1982
Davison v. Department of Defense
Citations
- 560 F. Supp. 1019
- 13 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20
- 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18175
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an environmental impact statement “cannot reasonably be expected to include references to each and every relevant scientific study or opinion.”
- “NEPA does not require perfection, and an EIS will not be rejected simply because it fails to address all possible contingencies or omits the views of a particular expert.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.