Skip to main content
· 5/28/1982

Davison v. Department of Defense

Citations

  • 560 F. Supp. 1019
  • 13 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20
  • 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an environmental impact statement “cannot reasonably be expected to include references to each and every relevant scientific study or opinion.”
  • “NEPA does not require perfection, and an EIS will not be rejected simply because it fails to address all possible contingencies or omits the views of a particular expert.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.