Davis v. Zain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f some presently unforeseen or unarticulated conflict arises between the criminal retrial and the pending § 1983 case, the district court may consider the propriety of a stay . . . .”
• “[I]f some presently unforeseen or unarticulated conflict arises between the criminal retrial and the pending § 1983 case, the district court may consider the propriety of a stay . . . .”
• “[I]f some presently unforeseen or unarticulated conflict arises between the criminal retrial and the pending § 1983 case, the district court may consider the propriety of a stay . . . .”
• “[I]f some presently unforeseen or unarticulated conflict arises between the criminal retrial and the pending § 1983 case, the district court may consider the propriety of a stay . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clay v. Allen
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-03-16· cited 82×
• United States v. White
  Second Circuit· 2012-08-30· cited 78×
• Poventud v. City of New York
  Second Circuit· 2013-04-19· cited 11×
• Doggett v. Perez
  E.D. Washington· 2004-02-27· cited 2×
• James Scott v. the City of Kerrville, Texas, the Kerrville, Texas Police Department, and the Kerrville, Texas Sheriff Department
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-11-29

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Heck v. Humphrey
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 15,294×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-09-30· cited 86×
• Dr. William D. Allen, Cross-Appellee v. Louisiana State Board of Dentistry, Cross-Appellants
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-01-05· cited 61×