Davis v. Woxall Hotel, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that defenses to confessed judgment not contained in petition to open or strike judgment are waived
• concluding that former Rule 2952(f), subsequently renumbered as Rule 2952(7
• explaining that “[d]efenses to a confessed judgment that are not contained in the petition to open or strike the judgment are waived”
• declining to address a defense raised on appeal, but not pleaded in appellant’s petition to open or strike
• remarking “[u]nless it is evident from the face of the instrument that the judgment is grossly excessive, or includes recovery for items not authorized by the instrument, a challenge to the accuracy of such amounts should be resolved by a petition to open the judgment”
• defenses to a confessed judgment not contained in the petition to open or strike judgment are waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).