Davis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he WCJ was free to reject the opinions of the medical experts whose opinions were based upon [the claimant’s] incredible version of events.”
• “In workers’ compensation cases, the WCJ is the ultimate fact-finder who must determine witness credibility and evidentiary weight. . . . The WCJ’s assessment of witness credibility is not subject to our review on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).