Davis v. Wisconsin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Rule 56(f) motion had been properly denied where discovery was immaterial as a matter of law
• possible evidence of inconsistent policy of the Food and Drug Administration is not sufficient to defeat summary judgment and does not justify granting a continuance pursuant to rule 56 [f]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).