Skip to main content
· 10/13/2009

Davis v. Widman

Citations

  • 2009 Ohio 5430
  • 184 Ohio App. 3d 705
  • 922 N.E.2d 272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting how the purpose of a preliminary injunction is to preserve the status quo of the parties pending a decision on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Preston, Willamowski, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.