Davis v. Wickham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a hearing on parties’ motions for judgment based on a Rule 11 agreement was not an action to enforce the settlement agreement
• concluding that a proceeding on the parties’ motions to render or not render judgment on a Rule 11 agreement, which was repudiated by one party before rendition of judgment, was “not an action to enforce a settlement agreement . . . based on proper pleading and proof” under Padilla

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).