Davis v. Virginia Commonwealth University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• giving the court discretion in its disposition of a motion to amend
• “The disposition of a motion to amend is within the sound discretion of the district court.” (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962))
• “Miss Davis received the right to sue letter on the second EEOC charge (disability, etc.) on October 1, 1996. Thus, the 90 day statute of limitations began to run on October 1, 1996 and expired on December 30, 1996.”
• “Miss Davis received the right to sue letter on the second EEOC charge (disability, etc.) on October 1, 1996. Thus, the 90 day statute of limitations began to run on October 1, 1996 and expired on December 30, 1996.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).