Skip to main content
· 7/6/2010

Davis v. United States Department of Justice

Citations

  • 610 F.3d 750
  • 391 U.S. App. D.C. 365
  • 38 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2063
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13698
  • 2010 WL 2651297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Congress added Section 552(a)(4)(E)(ii)(II) in 2007 so that FOIA plaintiffs could recover fees when their lawsuits prompted the government’s response
  • noting that Congress added § 552(a)(4)(E)(ii)(II) in 2007 after the Supreme Court rejected the catalyst theory under a different statute so that FOIA plaintiffs could prevail when their lawsuits prompted defendants’ response
  • “FOIA plaintiffs [are] eligible for a fee award if the lawsuit substantially caused the agency to release the requested records.”
  • “FOIA plaintiffs [are] eligible for a fee award if the lawsuit substantially caused the agency to release the requested records.”
  • “FOIA plaintiffs [are] eligible for a fee award if the lawsuit substantially caused the agency to release the requested records.”
  • “FOIA plaintiffs [are] eligible for a fee award if the lawsuit substantially caused the agency to release the requested records,” regardless of whether the plaintiff obtained any court-ordered relief.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Tatel, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.