Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Oregon Supreme Court· 8/16/1983

Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 668 P.2d 1186
  • 295 Or. 467
  • 1983 Ore. LEXIS 1438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that claim for money had and received was one specific form of general assumpsit, also known as quasi-contract
  • “It is not necessary that the defendant have received money from the plaintiff to enable the action to be maintained”
  • [t]he “common counts” of general assumpsit include (1) the indebitatus counts, (2) the value counts, and (3
  • a party may not simply plead a theory of recovery which might, later, be supported by “any state of facts”
  • to plead “ultimate facts,” a party must plead a “fairly specific description of facts”
  • describing Oregon’s fact pleading requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.