Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 2/6/1903

Davis v. Turner

Citations

  • 120 F. 605
  • 56 C.C.A. 669
  • 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4510

Syllabus

<p>1. Bankruptcy — Debts Provable Against Partnership — Note Signed by Individual Partners.</p> <p>A note signed, by the individual members of a bankrupt partnership, although under seal, may be shown by extrinsic evidence to be in fact a partnership obligation, and where it is shown that it was so Intended, and was given for money lent to the firm and used in the firm business, it may be proved against the partnership estate in bankruptcy.</p> <p>2. Chattel Mortgages — Validity—Informality of Instrument.</p> <p>In general, no particular words are required to constitute a mortgage of personal property. . The most informal instruments will be regarded in law as chattel mortgages if they show that a sale was made as security, and in equity any sale of chattels as security for a debt is regarded as a mortgage, although the fact that such was the purpose of the sale be not expressed by the instrument of sale, if it be proved by evidence aliunde.</p> <p>3. Same — Mortgage of Partnership Property.</p> <p>A mortgage of partnership goods as security for a partnership debt is not invalid because signed by the partners individually, nor because of the addition of a seal to the individual names.</p> <p>4. Same — Sufficiency op Description.</p> <p>The description in a chattel mortgage, signed by a number of persons, on “all the goods in the store where they are doing business, in E. City, N. C.,” may be supplemented by parol evidence to identify the goods; and the mortgage is not void for indefiniteness of description where it was shown that the signers were associated in mercantile business as partners, and had but one place of business, which was in Elizabeth City, N. C., and that the stock of goods referred to was the one in their store at that place.</p> <p>6. Same — Sale of Goods by Mortgagor.</p> <p>A chattel mortgage given by a firm of merchants on their stock of goods is not void for fraud because the mortgagors remained in possession for a few weeks and carried on thei

Judges: Boyd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.