Skip to main content
· 11/27/1979

Davis v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.

Citations

  • 480 F. Supp. 826
  • 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We cannot believe that the parties here intended that the optionee give full consideration under the agreement and then be deprived of his right to exercise the option....”
  • “The primary purpose of a company stock option plan is the attraction and retention of desirable employees, and the granting of an option is considered a form of compensation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.