Davis v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no conversion where “the property right alleged to have been converted arises entirely from the contractual rights to compensation”
• observing that a choice-of-law provision in a contract “is not necessarily determinative of the [choice-of-law] issue” under Kentucky law
• discussing detrimental reliance as a factor to consider for a promissory estoppel claim
• applying Kentucky 9 Under some circumstances, special use permits issued by federal agencies are considered a revocable license instead of a contract. See, e.g., Winterhawk Outfitters, Inc. v. United States, No. 12-133C, 2013 WL 12158146, at –4 (Fed. Cl. Jan. 2, 2013
• \[A]n oral promise made prior to the execution of a written agreement that is inconsistent with the unambiguous terms of the written agreement cannot form the basis of a promissory estoppel claim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).