Davis v. Sherman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding district court’s application of the arbitrary-and-capricious standard to review a decision to forfeit the plaintiff’s stock options, “especially in light of the full authority given to the Compensation Committee under the terms of the governing agreements and incentive plans”
• “Tt is well-established that “[w]here a bonus policy expressly reserves the right to the employer to pay or not pay bonuses, employees cannot claim a vested right or entitlement to payment of a bonus under that policy.”
• in finding that attorney-client privilege and work product protections over parts of an investigation conducted after plaintiff's termination was not waived, noting that “[d]efendants are relying only on the facts discovered through interviewing witnesses and reviewing documents.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).