Skip to main content
· 9/28/1979

Davis v. Schneider

Citations

  • 395 N.E.2d 283
  • 182 Ind. App. 275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where the writing is not produced, parol evidence is inadmissible to prove the contents of the writing unless its absence is adequately explained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lybrook, Lowdermilk, Robertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.