Davis v. Schifone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had an adequate post-deprivation remedy for the alleged theft of his money by a state police officer because he could have brought a Massachusetts state tort claim for conversion
• “Plaintiff’s wrongful arrest claim, if successful, would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction for operating under the influence” and was therefore barred by Heck
• “Under Heck, the principle barring collateral attacks ... is not rendered inapplicable by the fortuity that a convicted criminal is no longer incarcerated.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) (alteration in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).