Davis v. Sarles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “plaintiffs’ reliance on 18 U.S.C. § 241 and § 242 as the jurisdictional basis of their claim . . . fails as a matter of law since those federal criminal statutes do not create a private right of action.”
• \MPD is a subordinate entity of the District of Columbia that is incapable of being sued in its own name\
• “[P]laintiffs’ reliance on 18 U.S.C. § 241 … fails as a matter of law since th[is] 15 federal criminal statute[] do[es] not create a private right of action.”
• no private cause of action under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242
• no private right of action under 18 U.S.C. § 241

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).