Skip to main content
· 8/21/2018

Davis v. Rizzo

Citations

  • 819 S.E.2d 574
  • 261 N.C. App. 9

Syllabus

Appellate Procedure Rule 3(c) Civil Procedure Rules 59 and 60(b) Postjudgment motion to amend filed under Rule 59 did not toll the thirty-day limitation for taking appeal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “any Guidelines error deemed retroactive . . . must be corrected in a First Step Act resentencing”
  • holding that the district court must recalculate Guidelines range when considering sentence reduction under First Step Act
  • holding “that any Guidelines error deemed retroactive . . . must be corrected in a First Step Act resentencing”
  • “[T]he § 3553(a) sentencing factors apply in the § 404(b) resentencing context.”
  • instructing the district court to recalculate the Guidelines range

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elmore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.