Skip to main content
· 2/24/1967

Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing Corporation

Citations

  • 149 N.W.2d 37
  • 276 Minn. 116
  • 1967 Minn. LEXIS 990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the reliance element of fraud may be inferred from the plaintiff's conduct
  • noting that the reliance element of fraud may be inferred from the plaintiff’s conduct
  • affirming a jury’s award of damages to a plaintiff who relied on a false representation of “past or existing material fact”
  • affirming a jury's award of damages to a plaintiff who relied on a false representation of \past or existing material fact\
  • stating that elements of intentional misrepresentation include “proximate cause”
  • misrepresentation of past or present material fact and reliance are among eleven elements necessary to a fraud claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sheran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.