Davis v. Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an alarm company still owed a duty of care to a third- party even though the underlying contract did not spell out the company’s specific duties
• “As with other types of contracts, a plaintiff who is not a party to an alarm security contract, and never consented to its terms, cannot be bound by its limitation of damages clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).