Davis v. Principi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that equitable tolling did not apply because the appellant did not exercise “due diligence”
• reexamining Court’s caselaw in light of recent Federal Circuit cases regarding tolling of section 7266 appeal period and concluding that tolling not warranted because appellant did not act with necessary due diligence in keeping VA apprised of his current address
• applying a “presumption of regularity of mailing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).