· 9/7/1999
Davis v. Prentiss Properties Ltd., Inc.
Citations
- 66 F. Supp. 2d 1112
- 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1500
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13763
- 1999 WL 699755
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that for fraudulent joinder to exist, a claam would have to be so weak as to merit sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11
- suggesting that for fraudulent joinder to exist, a claim would have to be so weak as to merit sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11
- “The Court must therefore walk a very fine line; it must 10 consider the merits of a matter without assuming jurisdiction over it.”
- “[A] federal court's fraudulent- joinder consideration should be akin to an application of Rule 11.”
- “[S]ome room must exist between the standard for dismissal 22 under Rule 12(b)(6) . . . and a finding of fraudulent joinder. A court’s Rule 12(b)(6
- “[A] federal court's fraudulent-joinder consideration should be akin to an application of Rule 11.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pregerson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.