Skip to main content
· 9/7/1999

Davis v. Prentiss Properties Ltd., Inc.

Citations

  • 66 F. Supp. 2d 1112
  • 5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1500
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13763
  • 1999 WL 699755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that for fraudulent joinder to exist, a claam would have to be so weak as to merit sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11
  • suggesting that for fraudulent joinder to exist, a claim would have to be so weak as to merit sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11
  • “The Court must therefore walk a very fine line; it must 10 consider the merits of a matter without assuming jurisdiction over it.”
  • “[A] federal court's fraudulent- joinder consideration should be akin to an application of Rule 11.”
  • “[S]ome room must exist between the standard for dismissal 22 under Rule 12(b)(6) . . . and a finding of fraudulent joinder. A court’s Rule 12(b)(6
  • “[A] federal court's fraudulent-joinder consideration should be akin to an application of Rule 11.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.