Skip to main content
· 7/1/1857

Davis v. Pinckney

Citations

  • 20 Tex. 340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deferring to the juvenile court’s finding of maturity because it had the opportunity to observe the juvenile in person
  • the limited time a juvenile would be in the Division of Youth Services, while not a section 211.071.6 factor, is relevant to the suitability of the juvenile justice framework

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wheeler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.