Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the plaintiffs’ APA claim at the summary judgment stage because the plaintiffs “concede[d] that . . . [the APA claim] was brought solely as a protective claim, in case the PBGC sought to argue that this case was not cognizable under [the] ERISA”
• \[T]he Court will apply Chevron deference to those claims in which [the p]laintiffs challenge [the] PBGC's interpretations of ambiguous ERISA provisions.\
• “[T]he Court will apply Chevron deference to those claims in which [the p]laintiffs challenge [the] PBGC’s interpretations of ambiguous ERISA provisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).