Colorado Court of Appeals· 2/15/2001
Davis v. Paolino
Citations
- 21 P.3d 870
- 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 905
- 2001 Colo. App. LEXIS 292
- 2001 WL 125912
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint filed before a responsive pleading as “setting forth an amended complaint”
- the plaintiff should have been allowed to file a non-futile amended complaint against one defendant even after the court dismissed all claims against all defendants
- “[I]f a proposed amendment to the complaint would be futile, reversal is not required.”
- motion to dismiss is not a responsive pleading for purposes of C.R.C.P. 15(a)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Casebolt, Plank, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Buckley Powder Co. v. StateColorado Court of Appeals· 2002-12-19· cited 93×
- Gray v. University of Colorado Hospital AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-07-05· cited 19×
- Doe v. HeitlerColorado Court of Appeals· 2001-04-26· cited 8×
- MacUrdy v. FaureColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-12-27· cited 6×
- DIA Brewing, LLC v. MCE-DIA, LLCColorado Court of Appeals· 2020-02-06· cited 5×
- Schulz v. Laszlo & Associates, LLCColorado Court of Appeals· 2025-02-27· cited 5×
- Liscio v. PinsonColorado Court of Appeals· 2003-06-19· cited 2×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lee v. Colorado Department of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-05-02· cited 145×
- Holland v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-03-24· cited 55×
- Moody v. UngererSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-06-13· cited 55×
- State Ex Rel. Colorado State Claims Board of the Division of Risk Management v. DeFoorSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-02-03· cited 45×
- Fladung v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado· 1968-03-18· cited 20×
- Norsby v. JensenColorado Court of Appeals· 1995-07-13· cited 17×
- Renner v. ChiltonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1960-04-18· cited 15×
- JARVIS BY AND THROUGH JARVIS v. DeyoeColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-08-11· cited 14×
- Wilcox v. Reconditioned Office Systems of Colorado, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-02-24· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.