Davis v. Paolino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint filed before a responsive pleading as “setting forth an amended complaint”
• the plaintiff should have been allowed to file a non-futile amended complaint against one defendant even after the court dismissed all claims against all defendants
• “[I]f a proposed amendment to the complaint would be futile, reversal is not required.”
• motion to dismiss is not a responsive pleading for purposes of C.R.C.P. 15(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).